Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” contrasts the idyllic city of Omelas with the suffering of a single child, forcing us to confront the moral implications of socital happiness built upon ones individual despair. Omelas, initially a picture of idyllic joy, is revealed to be built upon the torment of a child. Kept in a dark filthy room enduring a life of misery and despair. Even though the citizens of Omelas are aware of this child’s suffering. They choose to accept it as the price for their happiness. For example, the story describes the city’s annual Festival of Summer, as a joyous celebration filled with music, laughter, and vibrant colors. This vivid depiction of happiness and prosperity contrasts sharply with the child’s solitary suffering. Additionally, the child’s condition is described as: “It is so thin there are no calves to its legs; its belly protrudes” This stark contrast between the beauty of Omelas and the horror of the child’s existence highlights the ethical dilemma at the heart of the story. Moreover, some citizens of Omelas are unable to reconcile themselves with this moral compromise, and choose to walk away from the city. Rather than living in complicity with the child’s suffering, choose to sacrifice their own happiness for the sake of their conscience. Le Guin’s story reflects real-world issues where societal progress often comes at the expense of individual well-being. By forcing readers to confront this moral dilemma, she invites us to question our own values and consider the ethical implications of our choices. Which more often than not, intentional or unintentionally come at the expense of the individual. 

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.